Sign in

You're signed outSign in or to get full access.

SR

Scholar Rock Holding Corp (SRRK)·Q3 2025 Earnings Summary

Executive Summary

  • Q3 2025 focused on regulatory path and launch readiness following the September 22 CRL; management held an in-person Type A meeting with FDA (including Novo Nordisk/Catalent Bloomington) and now anticipates BLA resubmission and a U.S. launch following approval in 2026; EMA decision remains targeted for mid‑2026 .
  • OpEx rose sharply y/y, driven by pre‑launch investments; G&A jumped to $53.1M (from $16.1M y/y) on headcount, professional services, and one-time severance; R&D was $50.5M; no revenue was recognized; net loss was $102.2M (EPS -$0.90) .
  • Cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $369.6M at 9/30; with ATM proceeds, debt draw, and potential ~$60M warrant exercises, runway extends into 2027; CFO outlined preference for expanding credit over equity to bridge to approval .
  • Key catalysts: FDA reinspection and minutes from Type A meeting; clarity on BLA resubmission class/timeline; second U.S.-based fill‑finish site tech transfer with commercial capacity reserved from Q1 2026; EMA review progress; OPAL dosing in <2 yrs SMA; SRK‑439 first‑in‑human start in Q4 2025 .

What Went Well and What Went Wrong

  • What Went Well

    • Constructive in-person Type A meeting with FDA (Neurology and Office of Compliance present); Novo detailed remediation progress for Bloomington and affirmed reinspection readiness by year-end; company now guides to U.S. launch post‑approval in 2026 .
    • Supply chain redundancy accelerated: a second U.S. fill‑finish facility selected with commercial capacity reserved beginning Q1 2026; tech transfer underway to de‑risk and support seamless commercial distribution .
    • Continued scientific/clinical momentum: dosing initiated in OPAL (SMA infants/toddlers <2 years), EMA MAA review ongoing (decision mid‑2026), and FDA cleared IND for SRK‑439 with Phase 1 dosing to start in Q4 2025 .
    • Quote: “We know that it is not a matter of if, but when apitegromab will be approved in the U.S.” – CEO David Hallal .
  • What Went Wrong

    • Regulatory delay: CRL tied to Catalent/Novo Bloomington CGMP status pushed U.S. approval/launch expectations from 2025 to 2026 (material timeline impact) .
    • Operating leverage pressure: G&A rose to $53.1M (+$37.0M y/y) with pre‑launch infrastructure, headcount, professional services, and severance; R&D also up y/y on commercial manufacturing and people costs; net loss widened to $102.2M .
    • Revenue/EPS vs S&P consensus: pre‑revenue status resulted in a small revenue miss; EPS slightly below consensus; the company remains non‑commercial and dependent on financing and regulatory milestones *.

Financial Results

Income statement summary (USD)

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
Revenue ($)$0 $0 $0 $0
Net Loss ($MM)$64.5 $74.7 $110.0 $102.2
Diluted EPS ($)-$0.66 -$0.67 -$0.98 -$0.90

Operating expenses (USD)

MetricQ3 2024Q1 2025Q2 2025Q3 2025
R&D Expense ($MM)$48.7 $48.7 $62.4 $50.5
G&A Expense ($MM)$16.1 $28.4 $49.7 $53.1
Total OpEx ($MM)$64.8 $77.1 $112.1 $103.6

Liquidity and runway

Metric3/31/20256/30/20259/30/2025
Cash & Equivalents + Mkt Sec ($MM)$364.4 $295.0 $369.6
Runway (Mgmt)Into 2027 Into 2027 Into 2027 (incl. $91.7M ATM, $50M debt; ~$60M warrants expected)

Estimates vs. actuals (Q3 2025)

MetricS&P ConsensusActualSurprise
EPS ($/sh)-$0.84*-$0.90 -$0.06
Revenue ($)$50,000*$0 -$50,000

*Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Observations:

  • EPS missed consensus modestly; revenue was guided as zero (pre‑commercial) and came in below a small estimate *.
  • G&A increased on launch readiness (employee +$13.2M, SBC +$7.6M, professional services +$14.3M, $1.1M severance) .
  • R&D up y/y on commercial manufacturing/launch readiness and employee costs .

No segments or product revenues are applicable at this stage.

Guidance Changes

MetricPeriodPrevious GuidanceCurrent GuidanceChange
U.S. Apitegromab Launch TimingPost‑FDA decisionPlanning U.S. launch upon 2025 approval Anticipated U.S. launch following approval in 2026 Lowered/Delayed
EMA Decision TimingEUAnticipated 2026 Decision expected by mid‑2026 Maintained (narrowed timing)
Second Fill‑Finish FacilityU.S. supplyNot previously specifiedCapacity reserved from Q1 2026; tech transfer underway New detail (accelerated redundancy)
OPAL (<2 yrs SMA)ClinicalExpect to initiate in Q3 2025 Dosing underway Advanced
SRK‑439 (IND/Phase 1)R&DIND filing 2H 2025 FDA cleared IND; dosing to commence Q4 2025 Advanced
Cash RunwayCorporateInto 2027 Into 2027; potential ~$60M from warrants by YE25 Maintained/Strengthened

Earnings Call Themes & Trends

TopicPrevious Mentions (Q1 & Q2)Current Period (Q3)Trend
FDA/BLA statusPriority review (PDUFA 9/22/25); constructive interactions; late-cycle meeting encouraging CRL tied solely to fill‑finish CGMP; Type A meeting constructive; resubmission & U.S. launch in 2026 Shifted from 2025 approval to 2026 approval/launch
Manufacturing/Fill‑finishObservations at CDMOs; working with partners; ample launch supply prepared Novo detailed remediation; reinspection readiness by YE; second U.S. vialer capacity secured for Q1’26 Risk mitigated with redundancy; visibility improving
Commercial readinessU.S. team hired/deployed; payer outreach ongoing Using extra time to deepen center-of-excellence engagement; broaden regional payer outreach Readiness strengthened pre‑approval
EMA/GlobalMAA validated; 2026 EU launch plan (Germany first) EMA decision mid‑2026; interdependency noted with U.S. manufacturing Maintained timeline
Pipeline: OPALPlan to initiate Q3 2025 Dosing underway in <2 yrs SMA Progressing
Pipeline: SRK‑439IND planned 2H25 IND cleared; Phase 1 to start Q4 2025 Advancing to clinic
Financing strategyDebt facility available; PRV monetization post approval considered Prefer credit expansion; royalty before equity; aim to avoid dilution Bias to non‑dilutive capital

Management Commentary

  • “We know that it is not a matter of if, but when apitegromab will be approved in the U.S.” – David Hallal, CEO .
  • “We have secured commercial capacity commencing in the first quarter of 2026, and tech transfer is now underway.” – David Hallal, CEO .
  • “The impact in the marketplace really should be almost seamless… whether… distributing… from the Bloomington facility or the new second vial.” – Keith Woods, COO .
  • “Our first objective here is to bridge the financing till the approval… extend our loan facility… Royalty probably comes next… equity… last and the most expensive.” – Vikas Sinha, CFO .

Q&A Highlights

  • Regulatory path and timeline: Management expects the reinspection to occur before resubmission; resubmission likely after a successful reinspection; class/timeline to be guided by FDA; tone from Type A meeting was constructive .
  • Manufacturing redundancy: Second U.S. vialer capacity secured (Q1’26) with minimal changes vs primary vial to speed validation; operational impact expected to be seamless .
  • Financing approach: Company intends to expand its credit facility, may consider royalty financing; aims to avoid equity raises; runway into 2027 assumes ~$60M warrant exercises and excludes PRV/launch proceeds .
  • Commercial readiness: Additional time used to deepen engagement across ~140 SMA centers and multidisciplinary teams; broader regional payer engagement ongoing .
  • EMA linkage: Mutual recognition/interdependency of manufacturing compliance acknowledged; mid‑2026 decision still expected .

Estimates Context

  • Q3 2025 EPS was -$0.90 vs S&P consensus of -$0.84 (miss of $0.06); revenue was $0 vs S&P consensus of $50,000 (immaterial miss in pre‑revenue context) *.
  • With U.S. launch now anticipated in 2026 and investments continuing ahead of approval, street models may push out first revenue and adjust OpEx cadence; watch for updates post reinspection/minutes.
    *Values retrieved from S&P Global.

Key Takeaways for Investors

  • Regulatory: The CRL was manufacturing‑site related only; Type A meeting constructive; watch for FDA reinspection outcome and meeting minutes – these are the gating catalysts to resubmission and to confirming 2026 approval/launch timing .
  • Supply chain: Second U.S. fill‑finish facility with Q1’26 capacity and ongoing tech transfer reduces reliance on Bloomington and supports stable commercial supply post‑approval .
  • Commercial readiness: U.S. field and market access teams are in place and using extra time to tighten payer and center engagement; could support efficient uptake once approved .
  • Financial runway: $369.6M cash at Q3; plan to expand debt and avoid dilution; runway into 2027 provides buffer through anticipated 2026 approval and early launch activities .
  • Expense trajectory: G&A step‑up reflects launch build (professional services, headcount, SBC); expect some spend deferrals until approval but elevated OpEx likely persists into pre‑launch period .
  • Pipeline momentum: OPAL dosing underway; SRK‑439 entering the clinic in Q4 2025; second apitegromab indication to initiate by YE25—each offers medium‑term optionality .
  • EU optionality: EMA mid‑2026 decision pathway intact; ex‑U.S. launch sequencing remains a lever for medium‑term growth once U.S. is clarified .

Appendix: Additional Data Points

  • Stock‑based compensation in Q3: $18.3M total; R&D $5.5M; G&A $12.8M .
  • y/y deltas: Net loss widened ($102.2M vs $64.5M), G&A +$37.0M y/y; drivers include launch infrastructure, headcount, professional services, and severance .
  • SAPPHIRE published in The Lancet Neurology with significant HFMSE benefit and favorable safety; underpins clinical value narrative at launch .